PCMDI

CAPT

Cloud Feedbacks

CMIP5

CMIP3

Other MIPs

Software

Publications

Google Calendar

Lab Calendar


Site Map

UCRL-WEB-152471

Privacy & Legal Notice

Thanks to Our Sponsors:

PCMDI > WCRP CMIP3 Model Output > Diagnostic Subprojects Printer Friendly Version
 
<< Back to WCRP CMIP3 Subproject Publications

  • Min, S.-K., and A. Hense, 2006: A Bayesian assessment of climate change using multimodel ensembles. Part I: Global mean surface temperature. J. Climate, 19, 3237-3256, doi: 10.1175/JCLI3784.1.

A Bayesian approach is applied to the observed global surface air temperature (SAT) changes using multi-model ensembles (MMEs) of the IPCC AR4 simulations and single-model ensembles (SMEs) with the ECHO-G model. A Bayesian decision method is used as a tool for classifying observations into given scenarios (or hypotheses). The prior probability of the scenarios, which represents a degree of subjective belief in the scenarios, is changed into the posterior probability through the likelihood where observations enter, and the posterior is used as a decision function. In the identical-prior case the Bayes factor (or likelihood ratio) becomes a decision function and provides an observational evidence for each scenario against a predefined reference scenario. Four scenarios are used to explain observed SAT changes as 'CTL' (control or no change), 'Nat' (natural forcing induced change), 'GHG' (greenhouse-gas induced change), and 'All' (natural plus anthropogenic forcing induced change). Observed and simulated global mean SATs are decomposed into temporal components of overall mean, linear trend, and decadal variabilities through Legendre series expansions, coefficients of which are used as detection variables. Parameters (means and covariance matrices) needed to define the four scenarios are estimated from SMEs or MMEs. Taking the 'CTL' scenario as a reference one, application results for global mean SAT changes for the whole 20th century (1900-1999) show decisive evidence (logarithm of Bayes factor > 5) for the 'All' scenario only. While 'strong' evidences (log of Bayes factor > 2.5) for both 'Nat' and 'All' scenarios are found in SAT changes for the first half (1900- 1949), there is 'decisive' evidence for the 'All' scenario for SAT changes in the second half (1950-1999), supporting previous results. It is demonstrated that our Bayesian decision results for global mean SATs are largely insensitive to both inter-model uncertainties and prior probabilities.


Last Updated: 2007-07-27

<< Back to WCRP CMIP3 Subproject Publications
 
For questions or comments regarding this website, please contact the Webmaster.
 
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  |  Physical & Life Sciences Directorate