PCMDI

CAPT

Cloud Feedbacks

CMIP5

CMIP3

Other MIPs

Software

Publications

Google Calendar

Lab Calendar


Site Map

UCRL-WEB-152471

Privacy & Legal Notice

Thanks to Our Sponsors:

PCMDI > WCRP CMIP3 Model Output > Diagnostic Subprojects Printer Friendly Version
 
<< Back to WCRP CMIP3 Subproject Publications

  • Perkins, S.E., A.J. Pitman, N.J. Holbrook, and J. McAneney, 2007: Evaluation of the AR4 Climate Modelsí Simulated Daily Maximum Temperature,. J. Climate, 20, 4356-4376, doi:10.1175/JCLI4253.1.

The coupled climate models used in the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change are evaluated. The evaluation is focused on 12 regions of Australia for the daily simulation
of precipitation, minimum temperature, and maximum temperature. The evaluation is based on probability
density functions and a simple quantitative measure of how well each climate model can capture the
observed probability density functions for each variable and each region is introduced. Across all three
variables, the coupled climate models perform better than expected. Precipitation is simulated reasonably
by most and very well by a small number of models, although the problem with excessive drizzle is apparent
in most models. Averaged over Australia, 3 of the 14 climate models capture more than 80% of the
observed probability density functions for precipitation. Minimum temperature is simulated well, with 10 of
the 13 climate models capturing more than 80% of the observed probability density functions. Maximum
temperature is also reasonably simulated with 6 of 10 climate models capturing more than 80% of the
observed probability density functions. An overall ranking of the climate models, for each of precipitation,
maximum, and minimum temperatures, and averaged over these three variables, is presented. Those climate
models that are skillful over Australia are identified, providing guidance on those climate models that
should be used in impacts assessments where those impacts are based on precipitation or temperature.
These results have no bearing on how well these models work elsewhere, but the methodology is potentially
useful in assessing which of the many climate models should be used by impacts groups.


Last Updated: 2007-12-12

<< Back to WCRP CMIP3 Subproject Publications
 
For questions or comments regarding this website, please contact the Webmaster.
 
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  |  Physical & Life Sciences Directorate