Cloud Feedbacks



Other MIPs



Google Calendar

Lab Calendar

Site Map


Privacy & Legal Notice

Thanks to Our Sponsors:

PCMDI > WCRP CMIP3 Model Output > Diagnostic Subprojects Printer Friendly Version
<< Back to WCRP CMIP3 Subprojects

  • Pitman, A.J., and S.E. Perkins, 2007: Reducing uncertainty in selecting climate models. Quantification and Reduction of Predictive Uncertainty for Sustainable Water Resources Management (Proceedings of Symposium HS2004 at IUGG2007, Perugia, July 2007). IAHS Publ., 313, 3-15.

Deciding which climate models to use to assess the impact of
climate change on water resources is particularly difficult in environments
where precipitation dominates resource vulnerability. We show that assessing
climate models based on their simulation of mean precipitation provides little
guide to a modelís ability to simulate the more extreme events that affect
hydrological systems. In contrast, a probability density function based assessment
using daily climate model data provides a good basis for confidence in a
modelís ability to simulate the 95th rainfall percentile. We demonstrate that
climate models have useful skill in simulating observed probability density
functions over two regions of Australia, although the well-known bias of
excess rainfall at low rates remains common. We conclude by identifying
those climate models that produce the best basis for hydrological impacts
assessment over two regions of Australia.

Last Updated: 2007-12-13

<< Back to WCRP CMIP3 Subprojects
For questions or comments regarding this website, please contact the Webmaster.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  |  Physical & Life Sciences Directorate