PCMDI

CAPT

Cloud Feedbacks

CMIP5

CMIP3

Other MIPs

Software

Publications

Google Calendar

Lab Calendar


Site Map

UCRL-WEB-152471

Privacy & Legal Notice

Thanks to Our Sponsors:

PCMDI > WCRP CMIP3 Model Output > Diagnostic Subprojects Printer Friendly Version
 
<< Back to WCRP CMIP3 Subproject Publications

  • Aavudai Anandhi, , 2011: Uncertainties in downscaled relative humidity for a semi-arid region in India. J. Earth Syst. Sci., 120, 375–386.

Monthly scenarios of relative humidity (RH) were obtained for the Malaprabha river basin in India
using a statistical downscaling technique. Large-scale atmospheric variables (air temperature and specific
humidity at 925 mb, surface air temperature and latent heat flux) were chosen as predictors. The predictor
variables are extracted from the (1) National Centers for Environmental Prediction reanalysis dataset
for the period 1978–2000, and (2) simulations of the third generation Canadian Coupled Global Climate
Model for the period 1978–2100. The objective of this study was to investigate the uncertainties in
regional scenarios developed for RH due to the choice of emission scenarios (A1B, A2, B1 and COMMIT)
and the predictors selected. Multi-linear regression with stepwise screening is the downscaling technique
used in this study. To study the uncertainty in the regional scenarios of RH, due to the selected predictors,
eight sets of predictors were chosen and a downscaling model was developed for each set. Performance of
the downscaling models in the baseline period (1978–2000) was studied using three measures (1) Nash–
Sutcliffe error estimate (Ef ), (2) mean absolute error (MAE), and (3) product moment correlation (P).
Results show that the performances vary between 0.59 and 0.68, 0.42 and 0.50 and 0.77 and 0.82 for
Ef , MAE and P. Cumulative distribution functions were prepared from the regional scenarios of RH
developed for combinations of predictors and emission scenarios. Results show a variation of 1 to 6%
RH in the scenarios developed for combination of predictor sets for baseline period. For a future period
(2001–2100), a variation of 6 to 15% RH was observed for the combination of emission scenarios and
predictors. The variation was highest for A2 scenario and least for COMMIT and B1 scenario.


Last Updated: 2011-11-02

<< Back to WCRP CMIP3 Subproject Publications
 
For questions or comments regarding this website, please contact the Webmaster.
 
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory  |  Physical & Life Sciences Directorate