Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, Victoria,
B.C., Canada
(Also affiliated with the Department
of Mathematics and Statistics,
University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C., Canada
V8W 2Y2)
It is therefore of great interest to document the extremes of surface temperature and precipitation that are simulated by modern general circulation models and compare them to the observed extremes.
1) 10-, 20- and 50-year return values will be estimated at every grid point by inverting the estimated Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) distribution fitted to the sample of annual extremes (annual extremes of 24-hour accumulated precipitation, daily maximum surface temperature and daily minimum surface temperature). (Zwiers and Kharin, 1998a; Kharin and Zwiers, 1998b).
2) threshold crossing frequency and duration analysis.
The properties of the simulated extremes, and the extent to which
their behaviour can be represented by standard statistical models,
will also be examined. For example, Kharin and Zwiers (1998b)
find that the GEV distribution does not properly fit the annual extreme
minimum and maximum temperatures simluated by the CCC coupled model
at all locations. This happens when there is year to year variation
in the physical processes that govern the model's surface temperature.
For example, Kharin and Zwiers (1998b) display a point in central
Australia for which the median annual extreme minimum temperature
is about -10C. However, there are several years in the sample
for which the annual extreme minumum temperature is very nearly 0C.
This clustering is an artifact of the model's simple bucket type
land surface and the interpolating scheme that is used to diagnose
screen temperature. The temperature of the land surface remains
at 0C until all liquid soil moisture is frozen. Thus there
are instances when the atmosphere would like to cool the surface
to a temperature substantially below zero, but the one-layer land
surface prevents this because it has a large thermal mass of liquid
water that is not properly isolated from the atmosphere. We will
use goodness of fit tests and other diagnostic techniques to determine
whether other models exhibit similar types of pathological behaviour.
Our expectation is that models with modern, multilayer land surface
schemes (such as CCC's GCM3 which will be used in AMIP2) will exhibit
fewer such problems.
Kharin, V. V., and F. W. Zwiers, 1998b: Changes in the Extremes in an Ensemble of Transient Climate Simulation with a Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean GCM. (http://ams.allenpress.com/amsonline/?request=get-abstract&issn=1520-0442&volume=011&issue=09&page=2200)
LLNL
Disclaimers
UCRL-MI-127350