Dynamical Extended-Range Forecasting (at Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory): Model DERF GFDLSM392.2 (T42 L18) 1993


AMIP Representative(s)

Mr. William Stern, Dynamical Extended-Range Forecasting, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory/NOAA, Princeton University, P.O. Box 308, Princeton, New Jersey 08540; Phone: +1-609-452-6545; Fax: +1-609-987-5063; e-mail: wfs@GFDL.GOV; World Wide Web URL (for GFDL): http://www.gfdl.gov/

Model Designation

DERF GFDLSM392.2 (T42 L18) 1993

Model Lineage

One of several versions of global spectral models in use at the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL), the DERF model is applied to dynamical extended- range forecast studies. The DERF model is similar in some respects to the GFDL climate model (e.g., as documented by Manabe and Hahn (1981) [1], but also displays a number of significant differences (e.g., use of triangular rather than rhomboidal spectral truncation and differences in horizontal/vertical resolution and in some physics schemes).

Model Documentation

Key documentation of model features is given by Gordon and Stern (1982) [2], Gordon (1986 [3], 1992 [4]), and Gordon and Hovanec (1985) [5], with additional details on the physics schemes provided by Miyakoda and Sirutis (1977 [12], 1986 [6]). Extended-range forecasting results are summarized by Miyakoda et al. (1979 [7], 1986 [8]), and by Stern and Miyakoda(1995)[33].

Numerical/Computational Properties

Horizontal Representation

Spectral (spherical harmonic basis functions) with transformation to a Gaussian grid for calculation of nonlinear quantities and some physics.

Horizontal Resolution

Spectral triangular 42 (T42), roughly equivalent to 2.8 x 2.8 degrees latitude- longitude.

Vertical Domain

Surface to 2.2 hPa. For a surface pressure of 1000 hPa, the lowest atmospheric level is at a pressure of about 998 hPa.

Vertical Representation

Finite-difference sigma coordinates.

Vertical Resolution

There are 18 unevenly spaced sigma levels. For a surface pressure of 1000 hPa, 5 levels are below 800 hPa and 5 levels are above 200 hPa.

Computer/Operating System

The AMIP simulation was run on a Cray Y/MP computer using a single processor in a UNICOS operating environment.

Computational Performance

For the AMIP experiment, about 5.5 minutes Cray Y/MP computation time per simulated day.

Initialization

For the AMIP simultation, the model atmosphere is initialized for 1 January 1979 from NMC analyses for 22 December 1978, and soil moisture and snow cover/depth are initialized from ECMWF analyses.

Time Integration Scheme(s)

A leapfrog semi-implicit scheme similar to that of Bourke (1974) [9] with Asselin (1972) [10] frequency filter is used for time integration. The time step is 15 minutes for dynamics and physics, except for full calculation of all radiative fluxes every 12 hours.

Smoothing/Filling

After condensation, filling of negative moisture values (that arise because of spectral truncation) is implemented by borrowing moisture from nearest east-west neighbors, but only if this is sufficient to make up the deficit (cf. Gordon and Stern 1982) [2].

Sampling Frequency

For the AMIP simulation, the model history is written every 6 hours.

Dynamical/Physical Properties

Atmospheric Dynamics

Primitive-equation dynamics are expressed in terms of vorticity, divergence, surface pressure, specific humidity, and temperature (with a linearized correction for virtual temperature in diagnostic quantities, where applicable).

Diffusion

Gravity-wave Drag

Gravity-wave drag is simulated after the method of Stern and Pierrehumbert (1988) [13], with wave breaking determining the vertical distribution of momentum flux absorption. Wave breaking occurs when the vertically propagating momentum flux exceeds a saturation flux profile, which is based on criteria for convective overturning.

Solar Constant/Cycles

The solar constant is the AMIP-prescribed value of 1365 W/(m^2). A seasonal, but not a diurnal cycle in solar forcing, is simulated.

Chemistry

The carbon dioxide concentration is the AMIP-prescribed value of 345 ppm. Zonally averaged seasonal mean ozone distributions are specified from a dataset derived from 1970s balloon-borne ozone-sonde measurements and (above 10 hPa) on limited satellite and rocket observations. These data are linearly interpolated for intermediate times. Radiative effects of water vapor, but not of aerosols, also are included (see Radiation).

Radiation

Convection

A convective scheme after Manabe et al. (1965) [23] performs moist static adjustment of saturated, unstable layers and of supersaturated stable layers. With use of the Mellor and Yamada (1982) [11] turbulence closure scheme (see Diffusion), dry convective adjustment is not explicitly performed (however, a radiative cooling adjustment for clouds at least 2 layers thick does not permit the lapse rate to exceed dry adiabatic). Simulation of shallow convection is parameterized in terms of the vertical diffusion, using a method similar to that of Tiedtke (1983) [24].

Cloud Formation

Precipitation

Precipitation from large-scale condensation and from the moist convective adjustment process (see Convection) forms under supersaturated conditions. Subsequent evaporation of falling precipitation is not simulated.

Planetary Boundary Layer

Conditions within the PBL are typically represented by the first 5 sigma levels above the surface (at sigma = 0.998, 0.980, 0.948, 0.901, and 0.844). See also Diffusion and Surface Fluxes.

Orography

Orography obtained from a 1 x 1-degree Scripps dataset (Gates and Nelson 1975 [26]) is interpolated to the model's Gaussian grid (see Horizontal Resolution). The heights are then transformed to spectral space and are truncated at T42 resolution.

Ocean

AMIP monthly sea surface temperature fields are prescribed, with daily values determined by linear interpolation.

Sea Ice

Snow Cover

Precipitation falls as snow if a linear combination of the air temperature on the lowest atmospheric level at sigma = 0.998 (weighted 0.35) and the temperature on the next higher level at sigma = 0.980 (weighted 0.65) is < 0 degrees C. Snow accumulates on both land and sea ice, and snow mass is determined prognostically from a budget equation that accounts for accumulation and melting. Snow cover affects the surface albedo and the heat transfer/capacity of soil. Sublimation of snow is calculated as part of the surface evaporative flux, and snowmelt contributes to soil moisture. See also Surface Characteristics, Surface Fluxes, and Land Surface Processes.

Surface Characteristics

Surface Fluxes

Land Surface Processes

Go to DERF References

Return to Model Table of Contents

Return to Main Document Directory


Last update August 9, 1996. For further information, contact: Tom Phillips (phillips@tworks.llnl.gov )

LLNL Disclaimers

UCRL-ID-116384