Pacific Northwest National Laboratory: Model PNNL CCM2 (T42 L18) 1997a


Contact Information

Experimental Implementation

Model Output Description

Model Characteristics


Contact Information

Modeling Group
AMIP Representative(s)

Modeling Group

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)

AMIP Representative(s)


Experimental Implementation

Simulation Period
Earth Orbital Parameters
Calendar
Radiative Boundary Conditions
Ocean Surface Boundary Conditions
Orography/Land-Sea Mask
Atmospheric Mass
Spinup/Initialization
Computer/Operating System
Computational Performance

Simulation Period

The simulation start time is the AMIP-specified 00Z 1 January 1979.  However, the stop time is 00Z 1 January 1996, two months earlier than the AMIP specification.

Earth Orbital Parameters

The treatment of orbital eccentricity, longitude of perihelion, and obliquity follows Paltridge and Platt (1976)[46]. In the model's treatment of solar insolation, obliquity, eccentricity, and longitude of perihelion are not specified explicitly. Instead, the eccentricity factor and declination are expressed in terms of the calendar day using expressions appropriate for the present Earth.  (The eccentricity factor is accurate to within 10-4.)
 

Calendar

The annual calendar is 365 days, without provision for leap years.

Radiative Boundary Conditions

AMIP II specifications are followed: the solar constant is 1365 Wm-2 (with both seasonal and diurnal cycles simulated), the carbon dioxide concentration is 348 ppmv, and the ozone concentration is specified from the recommended zonal-average monthly climatology of Wang et al. (1995)[41].  The effects of other greenhouse gases and of aerosols are not included.  See also Chemistry.

Ocean/Surface Boundary Conditions

The AMIP II sea surface temperature and sea ice boundary conditions derived by Taylor et al. (1997)  from observational data of Fiorino (1997) are used with the land/sea mask data.  Monthly sea ice extents are prescribed, with intermediate values determined at every 20-minute time step by linear interpolation.

Orography/Land-Sea Mask

Atmospheric Mass

The global-average model surface pressure is 982.22 hPa.

Spinup/Initialization

The procedure for spin-up of the model to quasi-equilibrium at the nominal starting time of 00Z 1 January 1979 is to initialize the model for state 00Z 1 January 1978 conditions, and then to integrate for 1 year using 1979 AMIP II SSTs and sea ice extents.

Computer/Operating System

The AMIP II simulation was run on a Sun Ultra 140 computer in the Solaris 2.5 operating system.

Computational Performance

For the AMIP II experiment, 40 minutes of computer time per simulated day.
 


Model Output Description

Calculation of Standard Output Variables
Sampling Procedures
Interpolation Procedures
Output Data Structure/Format/Compression

Calculation of Standard Output Variables

Sampling Procedures

All monthly mean values are calculated from samples accumulated at every time step.

Interpolation Procedures

Output Data Structure/Format/Compression

As specified by AMIP II, the output data are supplied in the LATS data structure in NetCDF format. The original word length of the data is 32 bits (i.e. data are not compressed).


Model Characteristics

AMIP II Model Designation
Model Lineage
Model Documentation
     Numerical/Computational Properties
          Horizontal Representation
          Horizontal Resolution
          Vertical Domain
          Vertical Representation
          Vertical Resolution
          Time Integration Scheme(s)
          Smoothing/Filling
     Dynamical/Physical Properties
          Equations of State
          Diffusion
          Gravity Wave Drag
          Chemistry
          Radiation
          Convection
          Cloud Formation
          Precipitation
          Planetary Boundary Layer
          Sea Ice
          Snow Cover
          Surface Characteristics
          Surface Fluxes
          Land Surface Processes
 

AMIP II Model Designation

PNNL CCM2 (T42 L18) 1997a

Model Lineage

The PNNL model is based on the NCAR Community Climate Model 2 (CCM2), a version of which NCAR CCM2 (T42 L18) 1992 was entered in AMIP I. The chief differences include more complex representations of cloud formation, precipitation, and land surface processes. Some related changes in the equations of state and in the treatment of cloud-radiative interactions, convective time scale, snow cover, and surface characteristics also are implemented. See also AMIP I/AMIP II Model Differences.

Model Documentation

Much of the NCAR CCM2 documentation by Hack et al. (1993)[3] remains relevant for the PNNL model. Differences in the treatment of clouds and related processes are documented by Ghan  et al. (1997)[39] , and differences in the land surface scheme by Dickinson et al. (1993)[40].
 

Numerical/Computational Properties

Horizontal Representation

Spectral (spherical harmonic basis functions) with transformation to a Gaussian grid for calculation of nonlinear quantities and most of the physics. Advection of water vapor is via shape-preserving semi-Lagrangian transport (SLT) on the Gaussian grid (cf. Williamson and Rasch 1994[10]).

Horizontal Resolution

Spectral triangular 42 (T42), roughly equivalent to 2.8 x 2.8 degrees latitude-longitude.

Vertical Domain

Surface to 3 hPa. For a surface pressure of 1000 hPa, the lowest atmospheric level is at a pressure of about 993 hPa.

Vertical Representation

Finite differences in hybrid sigma-pressure coordinates after Simmons and Strufing (1981) [14] are modified to allow an upper boundary at nonzero (3 hPa) pressure. The vertical-differencing formulation conserves global total energy in the absence of sources and sinks. See also Vertical Domain and Vertical Resolution.

Vertical Resolution

There are 18  unevenly spaced hybrid sigma-pressure levels. For a surface pressure of 1000 hPa, 4 levels are below 800 hPa and 7 levels are above 200 hPa.

Time Integration Scheme(s)

A centered semi-implicit time integration scheme (cf. Simmons et al. 1978 [15]) with an Asselin (1972)[16] frequency filter is used for many calculations, but horizontal and vertical diffusion, the advection of water vapor by the SLT scheme, and adjustments associated with convection and large-scale cloud formation are computed implicitly by a time-splitting procedure. The overall time step is 20 minutes for dynamics and physics, except for shortwave and longwave radiative fluxes and heating rates, which are calculated hourly (with longwave absorptivities and emissivities updated every 12 hours--see Radiation). Cf. Hack et al. (1993)[3] for further details.

Smoothing/Filling

Orography is smoothed. Because advection of moisture is treated by the SLT scheme, negative specific humidity values are avoided. In cases where negative mixing ratios would result from application of the countergradient term in the parameterization of nonlocal vertical diffusion of moisture in the PBL, this term is not calculated. In addition, at each 20-minute time step a "fixer" is applied to the surface pressure and water vapor so that the global average mass and moisture are conserved (cf. Williamson and Rasch 1994[10]).

Dynamical/Physical Properties

Equations of State

Primitive-equation dynamics are expressed in terms of vorticity, divergence, temperature, specific humidity, and the logarithm of surface pressure. Frictional/diffusive heating is included in the thermodynamic equation and virtual temperature is used where applicable. Additional prognostic variables required for the cloud formation scheme are total moisture mixing ratio, ice mixing ratio and number concentration, and condensation-conserved temperature.

Diffusion

Gravity Wave Drag

Orographic gravity wave drag is parameterized after McFarlane (1987) [18]. The momentum drag is given by the vertical divergence of the wave stress, which is proportional to the product of the local squared amplitude of the gravity wave, the Brunt-Vaisalla frequency, and the component of the local wind that is parallel to the flow at a near-surface reference level. At this reference level, the wave amplitude is bound by the lesser of the subgrid-scale orographic variance (see Orography) or a wave-saturation value defined by the reference Froude number. Above this level, the gravity-wave stress is assumed to be constant with height (zero vertical divergence), except in regions of wave saturation, where the amplitude is obtained from the local Froude number.

Chemistry

Radiative effects of carbon dioxide, ozone, oxygen, and water vapor are included, but effects of other greenhouse gases and of aerosols are not. See also Radiative Boundary Conditions and Radiation.

Radiation

Convection

Cloud Formation

Precipitation

Planetary Boundary Layer

The PBL height is determined by iteration at each 20-minute time step following the formulation of Troen and Mahrt (1986)[26]; the height is a function of the critical bulk Richardson number for the PBL, u-v winds and virtual temperature at the PBL top, and the 10-meter virtual temperature, which is calculated from the temperature and moisture of the surface and of the lowest atmospheric level (at sigma = 0.993) following Geleyn (1988)[27]. Within the PBL, there is nonlocal diffusion of heat and moisture after Holtslag and Boville (1993)[9]; otherwise (and under all conditions for momentum), properties are mixed by the stability-dependent local diffusion that applies in the model's free atmosphere. See also Diffusion and Surface Fluxes.

Sea Ice

The temperature of the ice is predicted by a four-layer scheme with a fixed temperature (-2 degrees C) of the underlying ocean as the lower boundary condition. The four layer thicknesses are all 0.5 m, and the ice density, heat capacity, and conductivity are specified uniform constants; however, daily snow cover that is prescribed from climatology (see Snow Cover) alters the thermodynamic properties and thickness of the top layer in proportion to the relative mass of snow and ice. Cf. Hack et al. (1993)[3] for further details.  See also Ocean/Surface Boundary Conditions.

Snow Cover

Surface Characteristics

Surface Fluxes

Land Surface Processes

Land surface processes are treated as in the BATS1e scheme of Dickinson et al. (1993)[40].



Go to:

AMIP I/AMIP II Model Differences

Model References

Return to:

Top of Page

Model/Experiment Table of Contents

AMIP II Documentation Directory

AMIP Home Page


Last update December 6, 2000. For questions or comments, contact Tom Phillips (phillips@pcmdi.llnl.gov) or the AMIP Representative(s).
 

LLNL Disclaimers

UCRL-MI-135872