AMIP I/AMIP II Model Differences: Model UKMO
HadAM3 (2.5x3.75 L19 ) 1998
AMIP II Model Designation
Most Similar AMIP I Model
AMIP I/AMIP II Model Differences
AMIP II Model
Designation
UKMO HadAM3 (2.5x3.75 L19) 1998
Most Similar AMIP
I Model
UKMO
HadAM1 (2.5x3.75 L19) 1993
AMIP I/AMIP II Model
Differences
Smoothing/Filling
The globally based filling of negative atmospheric moisture values in the
AMIP
I model has changed to a locally based scheme in which the negative
values are filled by removing moisture from surrounding grid points. If
these nearest neighbors cannot supply sufficient moisture, a default global
adjustment then is implemented.
Diffusion
Horizontal diffusion is represented as in the AMIP
I model, except that it is switched off near steep topography, and
in the troposphere Del6 horizontal diffusion is applied to atmospheric
moisture, in addition to potential temperature and winds.
Gravity Wave Drag
Gravity wave drag is represented by an enhanced version of the AMIP
I scheme after Gregory et al. (1998)[54]
that includes specification of the anisotropy of sub-grid orography as
well as low-level wave breaking due to hydraulic jumps and trapped lee
waves.
Chemistry
-
In addition to the radiatively active gases (water vapor, carbon dioxide,
and ozone) of the AMIP
I model, oxygen (O2, 209500 ppm), methane (CH4,
1650 ppbv), nitrous oxide (N2O, 306 ppbv), and chlorofluorocarbons
(CFC-11, 222 pptv and CFC-12, 382 pptv) are included. The AMIP I ozone
data also are replaced by the recommended zonal-mean monthly climatology
of Wang et al. (1995)[59].
-
Also in contrast to the AMIP
I model, radiatively active aerosols are included, with fixed background
concentrations specified as in Cusack et al. (1998)[49].
Radiation
The radiation scheme of the AMIP
I model is replaced by the following formulation:
-
The shortwave fluxes are calculated by a two-stream method, where the spectrum
is divided into 6 bands with the following boundaries (units of microns):
0.20-0.32; 0.32-0.69 (2 bands); 0.69-1.19; 1.19-2.38; and 2.38-5.00.
Within each band, data are treated using correlated k-distribution methods
(cf. Cusack et al. 1999[60]). Gaseous
absorption data are derived from HITRAN92 (cf. Rothman et al. 1992[75]),
except for ozone where the data are derived from LOWTRAN7 (cf. Kneizys
et al. 1988[76]). Rayleigh scattering
by gases and scattering/absorption by a climatological background aerosol
also are represented. See also Chemistry.
-
The longwave fluxes also are calculated by a two-stream method, where the
spectrum is divided into 8 bands with the following boundaries (units of
m-1): 0-40000; 40000-55000; 55000-80000 (excluding 59000-75000);
59000-75000; 80000-120000 (excluding 99000-112000); 99000-112000; 120000-150000;
and 150000-300000. Gaseous absorption data are derived from HITRAN92 and
continuum absorption by water vapor is treated using version 2.1 of the
CKD continuum model after Clough et al. 1989[77].
Cf. Cusack et al. (1999)[60] and Edwards
(1996)[62] for further details.
-
Cloud-radiative interactions are treated consistently in the shortwave
and longwave. The radiative properties of clouds are parameterized separately
for water and ice as functions of condensed water content and effective
radius. These parameterizations follow the functional forms of Slingo (1989)[20],
but with newly derived coefficients for each shortwave/longwave spectral
band. The effective radii of water droplets are calculated following Martin
et al. (1994)[61] , while the effective
radius of ice particles (treated as spheres) is fixed at 30 microns. Stratiform
and convective cloud are distinguished, with the latter treated as a vertical
tower. Clouds in adjacent layers are assumed to overlap maximally, and
otherwise to overlap randomly, with the vertical coherence of stratiform
and convective cloud accounted for. Mixed phase clouds are represented
by horizontally adjacent regions of ice and water cloud. Cf. Edwards and
Slingo (1996)[50] for further details.
See also Convection and
Cloud
Formation.
Convection
The mass-flux scheme of the AMIP
I model is augmented by a parameterization of convective momentum transport
after Gregory et al. (1997)[53].
Cloud Formation
The treatment of sub-gridscale convective cloud is the same as in the AMIP
I model, and that of stratiform cloud is similar, except that the prognostic
cloud-conserved quantities are assumed to vary according to a triangular,
rather than a top-hat, statistical distribution.
Precipitation
The representation of precipitation is the same as in the AMIP
I
model, with the following exceptions:
-
The temperature criteria for determining whether the large-scale
precipitation condensate is liquid or ice have changed: the condensate
is treated as liquid at temperatures above 0 deg C, and as ice below -9
deg C, with the liquid/ice fraction at intermediate temperatures determined
by linear interpolation (cf. Gregory and Morris 1996[52]).
-
The representation of evaporation/sublimation of falling liquid/frozen
precipitation follows the method of Gregory (1995)[51].
Planetary Boundary Layer
The PBL representation is the same as in the AMIP
I model, except for the treatment of mixing: non-local ("rapid
mixing") terms are no longer included, and the K-theory diffusivities are
calculated from the local Richardson number, the vertical shear, and a
mixing length that depends on the PBL depth.
Snow Cover
As in the AMIP
I model , the snow pack is assumed to have a constant density of 250
kg m-3. Other snow parameters also remain the same, except
that the criterion for snowmelt is modified for consistency with the AMIP
II model's determination of surface energy partitioning:
melt occurs when the diagnostic skin temperature or the mean temperature
of the top soil/snow layer exceed 0 degrees C.
Surface Characteristics
Surface characteristics are the same as in the AMIP
I model, except over land:
-
An effective momentum roughness length is included to represent unresolved
orographic form drag (cf. Milton and Wilson 1996[56]).
-
Three soil texture types--fine, medium, and
coarse--are represented, based on the 1x1-degree map of Wilson and Henderson-Sellers
(1985)[37]. Mean textures for each
2.5x3.75-degree grid box are calculated as weighted means of sand, silt,
and clay fractions.
-
Geographically varying fields of the vegetation parameters are derived
by assigning typical values to the 23 landcover classes of the 1 x 1-degree
data of Wilson and Henderson-Sellers (1985)[37].
Effective parameters for each grid box are calculated as area-weighted
means for all parameters, except for the roughness length which is aggregated
using a blending height concept (cf. Mason 1988[55]).
Those vegetation parameters in common with the AMIP
I land-surface scheme (snow-free albedo, deep-snow albedo, roughness
length, canopy interception capacity, and infiltration enhancement factor)
are taken from Buckley and Warrilow (1988)[38].
These, along with parameters required by the new
land-surface scheme (leaf area index and canopy height), are documented
by Cox et al. (1999)[48]. See also
Surface
Fluxes and Land Surface Processes.
Surface Fluxes
In a departure from the AMIP
I model, the partitioning of surface energy fluxes follows a Penman-Monteith
approach with a diagnosed surface skin
temperature. The residual ground heat flux
is
proportional to the difference between this skin temperature and the temperature
of the top soil layer, where the heat conductivity decreases with snow
cover and soil water/ice content (cf. (cf. Smith et al. 1994[58]
and Cox et al. 1999[48]). The continental
moisture flux (including sublimation from snow, evaporation from the wet
vegetation canopy and from bare soil, and transpiration by the vegetation)
also now is regulated by a new land-surface
scheme:
-
The atmospheric evaporative demand is met first by sublimation from snow
which occurs at the potential rate (i.e. aerodynamic resistance only),
following a bulk formulation.
-
The canopy is represented as a single-story "big leaf" whose height, leaf
area index, and water storage capacity vary with vegetation type. Canopy
interception is determined assuming the sub-gridscale rainfall intensity
follows an exponential distribution (cf. Dolman and Gregory 1992[34]).
Evaporation from the wet canopy occurs at the potential rate, where the
wet fractional area varies linearly with the canopy storage. (A non-zero
wet area also is prescribed on bare soil to allow for ponding effects.)
Evaporation from bare soil is limited by aerodynamic and soil surface resistance
(a constant 100 s m-1) and by a ``beta'' factor that depends
on the volumetric moisture content of the top soil
layer: beta is 0 if moisture content is less than a wilting point and
is 1 if greater than a critical point, while beta varies linearly for intermediate
moisture contents. The wilting and critical points (corresponding, respectively,
to soil water suctions of 1.5 MPa and 0.033 MPa) vary geographically according
to soil texture types.
-
The rooting depth for transpiration is assumed
to be 1 meter (the top 3 soil layers) for all
vegetation types except trees, which can draw moisture from the entire
3-meter soil column. Transpiration also is limited by a bulk stomatal resistance,
which is calculated by the coupled canopy conductance-photosynthesis
scheme of Cox et al. (1998)[47] that
includes a representation of carbon fluxes. The bulk resistance depends
on surface temperature, vapor pressure deficit, photosynthetically active
radiation (PAR), carbon dioxide concentration, and soil moisture availability.
See also Surface Characteristics
and Land Surface Processes.
Land Surface Processes
The AMIP
I formulation of land surface processes is replaced by the Meteorological
Office Surface Exchange Scheme (MOSES) of Cox et al. (1999)[48]:
-
The vegetated and bare-soil fractions
of a grid box are both at the diagnosed skin
temperature. The subsurface temperatures are updated using a discretized
form of the heat diffusion equation that is applied in four
vertical layers (thicknesses 0.1, 0.25, 0.65, and 2.0 m, with depth), subject
to a zero-flux lower boundary condition. Effects of soil water phase changes
on heat capacity are incorporated by the approach of Williams and Smith
1989[63], in which the maximum unfrozen
water at a given temperature is derived from the soil water suction curve
(cf. Black and Tice 1988[64]). The
effective soil thermal conductivity is calculated as a function of water
and ice content after Farouki (1981)[65].
-
Soil hydrology is based on a finite difference
approximation to the Richards equation (cf. Richards 1931[66])
with the same vertical discretization as for soil thermodynamics. The moisture
within a layer is incremented by the net incoming/outgoing Darcian fluxes,
and by transpiration. The dependencies of
soil water suction and hydraulic conductivity on soil moisture follow Clapp
and Hornberger (1978)[67], with parameters
derived from the Wilson and Henderson-Sellers (1985)[37]
soil texture dataset using the regression relations of Cosby et al. (1984)[68].
-
Surface runoff occurs whenever the grid-box
mean rainfall intensity (computed from an exponential sub-gridscale distribution--cf.
Dolman and Gregory 1992[34]) exceeds
the hydraulic conductivity for prescribed saturated moisture values that
depend on the soil texture types. Drainage
also occurs from the base of the soil column at a rate equal to the hydraulic
conductivity of the deepest soil layer (i.e. a "free drainage" lower boundary
condition is applied); however, lateral flow and recharge from below are
not represented. See also Surface Characteristics
and Surface Fluxes.
Go to:
References
Return to:
Top of Page
AMIP II Model/Experiment Documentation
AMIP II Documentation Directory
AMIP Home Page
Last update December 6, 2000. For questions or comments, contact
Tom Phillips (phillips@pcmdi.llnl.gov).
LLNL Disclaimers
UCRL-MI-135872