AMIP I/AMIP II Model Differences: Model UKMO  HadAM3 (2.5x3.75 L19 ) 1998


AMIP II Model Designation

Most Similar AMIP I Model

AMIP I/AMIP II Model Differences



 

AMIP II Model Designation

UKMO HadAM3 (2.5x3.75 L19) 1998

Most Similar AMIP I Model

UKMO HadAM1 (2.5x3.75 L19) 1993
 

AMIP I/AMIP II Model Differences


Smoothing/Filling

The globally based filling of negative atmospheric moisture values in the AMIP I model has changed to a locally based scheme in which the negative values are filled by removing moisture from surrounding grid points. If these nearest neighbors cannot supply sufficient moisture, a default global adjustment then is implemented.
 

Diffusion

Horizontal diffusion is represented as in the AMIP I model, except that it is switched off near steep topography, and in the troposphere Del6 horizontal diffusion is applied to atmospheric moisture, in addition to potential temperature and winds.

Gravity Wave Drag

Gravity wave drag is represented by an enhanced version of the  AMIP I scheme after Gregory et al. (1998)[54] that includes specification of the anisotropy of sub-grid orography as well as low-level wave breaking due to hydraulic jumps and trapped lee waves.

Chemistry

Radiation

The radiation scheme of the AMIP I model is replaced by the following formulation:

Convection

The mass-flux scheme of the AMIP I model is augmented by a parameterization of convective momentum transport after Gregory et al. (1997)[53].
 

Cloud Formation

The treatment of sub-gridscale convective cloud is the same as in the AMIP I model, and that of stratiform cloud is similar, except that the prognostic cloud-conserved quantities are assumed to vary according to a triangular, rather than a top-hat, statistical distribution.
 

Precipitation

The representation of precipitation is the same as in the AMIP I model, with the following exceptions:

Planetary Boundary Layer

The PBL representation is the same as in the AMIP I model, except for the treatment of mixing: non-local ("rapid mixing") terms are no longer included, and the K-theory diffusivities are calculated from the local Richardson number, the vertical shear, and a mixing length that depends on the PBL depth.

Snow Cover

As in the AMIP I model , the snow pack is assumed to have a constant density of 250 kg m-3.  Other snow parameters also remain the same, except that the criterion for snowmelt is modified for consistency with the AMIP II model's determination of surface energy partitioning:  melt occurs when the diagnostic skin temperature or the mean temperature of the top soil/snow layer exceed 0 degrees C.
 

Surface Characteristics

Surface characteristics are the same as in the AMIP I model, except over land:

Surface Fluxes

In a departure from the AMIP I model, the partitioning of surface energy fluxes follows a Penman-Monteith approach with a diagnosed surface skin temperature. The residual ground heat flux is proportional to the difference between this skin temperature and the temperature of the top soil layer, where the heat conductivity decreases with snow cover and soil water/ice content (cf. (cf. Smith et al. 1994[58] and Cox et al. 1999[48]). The continental moisture flux (including sublimation from snow, evaporation from the wet vegetation canopy and from bare soil, and transpiration by the vegetation) also now is regulated by a new land-surface scheme:

Land Surface Processes

The AMIP I formulation of land surface processes is replaced by the Meteorological Office Surface Exchange Scheme (MOSES) of Cox et al. (1999)[48]:




Go to:

References

Return to:

Top of Page

AMIP II Model/Experiment Documentation

AMIP II Documentation Directory

AMIP Home Page


Last update December 6, 2000. For questions or comments, contact Tom Phillips (phillips@pcmdi.llnl.gov).
 

LLNL Disclaimers

UCRL-MI-135872